tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7480649783214657831.post5514053087281276149..comments2023-03-25T03:15:14.047-07:00Comments on the four-headed monster: Should the Beatles have become famous?4headedmonsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05542377105561885448noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7480649783214657831.post-67167800637214563022011-06-20T23:12:03.583-07:002011-06-20T23:12:03.583-07:00Yay, and congrats on your first blog post. It is w...Yay, and congrats on your first blog post. It is with great pleasure that I become the first person to post to on your blog.<br /><br />Yes, the Beatles should have become famous, I believe, because without them we would not have great artists such as Jimi Hendrix, Keith Moon, and many other artists who were inspired by the Beatles. Music as an art may have stagnated (as it is right now), and the generations to come would have been minuscule at best.<br /><br />Would the Beatles have been better if they never toured? Maybe, but when you're at the top of the charts consistently for years, how much more room is there for improvement? I think the pros outweigh the cons in that what the music industry benefited from the Beatles outweighs what the fan missed out on because of them becoming famous.Mohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13031429591355118666noreply@blogger.com